In retrospect, my article refuting the lies surrounding the Vindex mythos did not clearly delineate the reasons I consider the truth about Vindex as damning as it is. In fact, I left my primary criticisms implied and unspoken, and as thus, unheard.
(1) Von Sangettal and Ulfgangr Satanara have both told me that they were aware of the truth about Vindex prior to my public revelation of it. This indicates, by way of probability, that there most likely were many Niners (perhaps 10-20) who were aware of this truth.
And none of them broke the story.
I want you to consider the implications of the fact that it was Traditional Demonolater and an initiate of the Draconian Tradition rather than a Niner who brought this to the public. ZERO ONA members* were willing to do so.
Since the Satanism of the ONA is, in majority, predicated upon the Sinister Dialectic, and the remainder of the Western Black Lodge is predicated upon the emulation or veneration of the Infernal Divine, there is inevitably a discrepancy between the ethos of the ONA and the remainder of the Western Black Lodge. The fact that I broke this story, independently, despite my distaste for the ONA, instantiates the discrepancies between these ethioi (is that the plural of ethos?) in two ways.
(i) As I follow the ethos established by the Infernal Divine, I felt the need to lead the way for my brothers in the Western Black Lodge, regardless of their opposition to me. The members of the ONA who knew the truth about Vindex, being followers of the ethos of the Sinister Dialectic, were entirely content to watch their brothers in the movement be manipulated like cattle.
(ii) I was willing, in accordance with the ethos of the Infernal Divine, to challenge the orthodoxy upheld by my brothers within the Black Lodge, publicly. The members of the ONA who knew the truth about Vindex, in contrast, were willing to uphold the orthodoxy by their silence, despite the fact that they knew it was fallacious.
(2) The ONA calls its members to the pursuit of cliological agendas, which places an incredible amount of responsibility on them to be, ultimately, leaders, even from within the ranks. In contradiction, the ONA kept the truth about Vindex almost entirely secret, relying upon the intellectual incompetence of its members to manipulate them for the achievement of cliological agendas. The result of this contradiction is illustrated by (i) and (ii).
The ONA’s dissertations regarding Vindex have never represented him for what (who) he really is. He has always been represented as a coming savior, likened variously to Krishna or the Antichrist. This is manipulation– in fact, it is propaganda.
A certain leading figure in the ONA by the name of DarkLogos, referred to as well as DL9 and Lianna, has been exposed as a propagandist time and time again. Similarly, Kayla and Chloe 352 have been caught promoting rampant lies about their activities to create the illusion that their influence exceeds its actual parameters. Anton Long is known to have adopted multifarious pseudonyms in order to misrepresent his personhood as a multitude (as is Lianna).
Look at the hours upon hours propagandists have spent promoting exaggerations and lies to convince the public that the ONA is more powerful than it has ever truly become. The praxis and Occultism of which comprise the Sevenfold Way are valid, unique, and powerful, while those who propagate the 7FW are vile, honourless, and impotent in their majority. Beldam, Von Sangettal, and Ulfgangr Satanara (and probably Ryan Anschauung as well) are all exempt from my condemnations of the ONA.
*Despite the claims made by leading voices in the ONA, the ONA is, in fact, a movement, and the conduct and weltanschauungen of those who follow this movement, and who are therefore members of this movement, does reflect the nature of this movement.
For the sake of clarity, I use the words “movement” and “group” to denote different things. A group is formally structured whereas a group is not. Movements most often lack things such as membership fees and leaders. The ONA has always been seen as a movement and it has always operated as movements do. Third-wave feminism is another example of a movement, hence its lack of administration/leadership. Being a member of third-wave feminism, like being a member of the ONA, entails no distinct formal or hierarchic structure.