The Validity of E.A. Koetting

I’ve been asked about my opinion of E. A. Koetting on numerous occasions, but as far as I can tell, most people doubt his intellectual and spiritual credibility solely on the basis of the salesman techniques he uses. It seems to me that an actual review of his recorded gnosis (spiritually-derived knowledge) and a review of the efficacy of his magickal practices has hitherto been unattempted. This article will fill the vacuum, but first, let’s analyze his marketing praxis.

I’ve see all his salesman tricks used before in other industries– they’re formulaic; they’re clockwork. First, he has to muddy the waters with statements like “I spent YEARS reading every book I can find.” That kind of statement is useful in that it allows the advertiser to lower the perceived credibility of his or her competition without addressing specific texts or offering valid criticisms of them. Similarly, when Koetting was marketing his magickal circles, he says something to the effect of “Magick circles made by other vendors are always in such bad quality that they border on being useless,” making it seem like his product is an oasis in an arid desert. (Note: I cannot attest to the quality of the countless magick circles he has contraindicated the purchase of without evidence).

There are many components to this formula: talk about how deeply successful your latest projects have been. Create a consistently-released newsletter packed with free and informative essays– this gives people an incentive to keep getting advertisements from you.

e6bc4f08a1fe9100a77ace3bdce9eaed

 

Koetting is also criticized for his side-job: carpet cleaning. Perhaps it’s my Southern upbringing, but I personally do not have it in me to look down on someone for taking up a blue-collar occupation. Remember, E.A. Koetting was an orphan and his lifelong passions are writing and spirituality. An occuptation centering on physical labor is pretty much par for the course.

So, let’s talk Occultism. Are his spiritual formulas valid? Of his “Four Incantations to Conjure Limitless Power”, I have used his fill-in-the-name evocation formula countless times with success. The chant called the “song of Belial” which debuted in his literature is powerful as well. Similarly, a witch I knew frequently used Koetting’s chant calling on Azazel and got excellent results as well.

But we have to analyze the veracity of his demonology as well before we can give a full review. Being able to provide efficacious techniques is a completely separate specialty from the provision of accurate gnosis regarding divinity. First, Belial. Koetting has been criticized for his unorthodox delineation of Belial as “One of the Four Gatekeepers” rather than citing one of the ranks previously attributed to the spirit in demonology. Nonetheless, the literature of the Temple of the Ascending Flame has substantiated Koetting’s insight in their calling of Belial as an initiatior and psychopomp.

Koetting also mentioned that Belial “captivates” female operators in a uniquely potent way. I can attest to the accuracy of this in my own observations of sorceresses I’ve corresponded with who venerate Belial.

Koetting also cites Abaddon as being one of the four gatekeepers, which is substantiated by the gnosis of a friend of mine who works very closely with Abaddon, but does not follow Koetting’s literature.

Lastly, his information regarding Baphomet as the Bloodbath Enchantress of the Order of the Nine Angles. Koetting wrote that Baphomet as the Mother of Human Sacrifice is completely tied to the symbol of the averse pentagram, which has never been attested in O9A literature. During one of the first seances I sought knowledge of the O9A’s esotericism in I was told that in order to evoke the Blood Maiden I would need a pentagram of evocation rather than a triangle evocation– I had never used or even considered a pentagram of evocation until that night. I did not read any of Koetting’s books until months after this seance, so being able to personally verify his gnosis without reading it first surprised me. Nonetheless, it became a trend.

This trend was continued when I summoned Aosoth after reading Koetting’s description of her, and once again, he was totally accurate. I compared my notes on Aosoth (which lined up with Koetting’s description) with those of a more tried-and-true Niner and found further substantiation.

I am not calling him infallible: I do disagree with some points of his gnosis– what I’m saying is that I have seen a pattern of credibility established.

Tl;dr: Even though he is a salesman, Koetting is well worth the read.

-V.K. Jehannum

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “The Validity of E.A. Koetting

  1. Great article. Also as a late cousin of mine can attest, there is actually a lot of money to be made in carpet cleaning. The thing is you actually have to work, which some people just don’t want to.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Having had the opportunity to interview Koetting personally http://www.blogtalkradio.com/theooze/2011/10/31/outbreak-edition–take-action, I can tell you with certainty that his insights are honed from genunine work he has put in. They work or they don’t work, it doesn’t truly matter in my eyes; I don’t personally think that is where integrety is gained. I try to see the whole of one’s expression, and use that as my reed from which to measure. His steady manifestations, and mastery in his brand of social-engineering, are all I need to recognize his credibility. Then again, you have to know, I have a love for tricksters and whores.

    As a quick aside, I noticed you posted one of your blog posts on the Cult of Cthulhu forum. Then you and the post disappeared. I wonder, why you didn’t leave it up?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for sharing your insights regarding Koetting– I have received a LOT of interesting commentary on this article (primarily on Facebook) which I intend to construct into something of a follow-up article.
      Regarding the article posted on CoC, it was deleted along with my account by an admin, not myself. I think it is understandable that they would take a stance against some arrogant twenty-year-old plugging his WordPress blog.
      I liked the Cult of Cthulhu’s literature though. It has shaped my view to this day. While I have conceded in the past that Venger As’Nas Satanas lost his shit and got too much of an ego (hence his dismantlement at the hands of various Niners and O9A affiliates), his literature exhibited a unique perspicacity.

      Like

      1. Venger certainly had his flaws, but once again it is the whole of the work, that I consider. Clearly you’ve formed somewhat of the same sentiment. As you probably know, he is long gone from the Cult. In fact, it would seem.. to be me and the occasional passer-by these days. I’m not sure why Shawn deleted you and your post, but I thought it offered an interesting gleaning. So much so that I found this blog of yours and visit it often. Anyway, should you ever want to return; I can promise you, you won’t be denied. I was always that “arrogant twenty-year-old plugging his WordPress blog”. Hell… truth be known… I’m still slinging my slop whenever opportunity presents itself. Like I said I have a love for tricksters and whores.

        Liked by 1 person

          1. At this point, I’m reworking and rewording just about everything I’ve ever written. So there isn’t much to see, but when I’m finished you’ll find it @ http://insidiousway.altervista.org/ or on the CoC forum. I also plan to reopen The Ooze (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/theooze) by Walpurgis 2017, though that may never materialize because I don’t want to burn out on it again. I have a habit of trying to keep too many ores in the fire.

            Liked by 1 person

  3. Yes; I do not care about what Koetting does in his personal life, a mere try of a few of his techniques proved to have merit and I complimented him for his occult work in general via his FB page. It is a pity that he sprinkles it with a bit of BS for the sake of sensationalism. My blog contains 2 works up to this point in which I worked with sources provided by him. Shame that a lot of mages in the world are biased and want nothing to do with anything that mentions him.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I’ve been interected in Koetting for some time now, but his rather crass commercialism has left me wanting. Your post has caused me to rethink this view. I just might give him a shot.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s